Have you
ever checked into a motel and noticed a little ring of paper around the toilet
seat printed with these words – “Sanitized for Your Protection”? My good birding friend David Deifik has used
this phrase though in a very different context.
Consider the situation most all of us have been in where, although we
have a certain bird on our life lists, in the back of our mind we might
question the ID, or maybe we just want to get a better view of that species in
general. Once we do get that more definitive
view of the species in question we feel much better about having that bird on
our list. Hence our lists have been - “Sanitized
for Your Protection”.
I had an
opportunity to “sanitize” my MA statelist a bit in February 2019 when a
Trumpeter Swan was spotted with Mute Swans at the Milford Pond in Milford. I already had this species on my MA list
based on a sighting on 3/21/04 in Northampton, MA. Undoubtedly both the 2004 and the 2019 birds
were directly or indirectly associated with the re-introduction efforts
occurring in the Great Lakes. But it was
only when I started reading about the reports of the 2019 bird that I realized
that the Massachusetts Avian Records Committee (MARC) did not accept the 2004
bird because it was felt that the Great Lakes population was not yet
self-sustaining. So although there was
no question about the ID of the 2004 bird, it was still not countable on your
MA statelist if you wanted to “play by the rules” so to speak. Instead, the first MA record of Trumpeter
Swan to be accepted by MARC was a bird from Charlton in May 2018. So if I wanted sanitize the Trumpeter Swan
record on my MA list I needed to go see the Milford bird. Assuming this bird ends up being accepted by
MARC that is.
The
Trumpeter had been spotted daily since January 28, often associating with
several Mute Swans. And even though the
pond froze over during that time, the Trumpeter Swan remained at the pond and
was quite reliable. Most importantly it
was indicated in one post that sightings before 2018 weren’t countable,
otherwise I would have continued to have a non-countable bird on my MA
list. So on February 5th I made the
short trek to Milford Pond, followed the directions to park behind the NRG
building on the western side of the pond, and then walked down toward Clark
Island. A couple hours earlier there was
a post that the Trumpeter was sitting on the ice north of the island with a
pair of Mute Swans, so I was quite optimistic.
As I neared
the island I got a glimpse of Swans out on the ice. A quick binoc view yielded 3 birds – I likely
had the Trumpeter and 2 Mutes but all were sleeping. I needed a better view. I walked along the trail on Clark Island and
got to a spot where I was closest to the Swans.
From there scope views confirmed 2 Mute Swans now walking around on the
ice a bit in the distance, and one closer Swan which was still asleep on the
ice. Undoubtedly this was the Trumpeter
but I had to be sure – after all I was there to “sanitize” my list. Here is a phone-scoped photo of the bird as
it slept.
After about
10 minutes I still had no view of the third bird’s head and bill to make a
definitive ID. I started to try to
compare sizes since Trumpeters are often a bit bigger than Mutes, but the birds
weren’t very close together so comparisons weren’t easy. Then I realized that the necks of the two
Mutes were a bit yellower than that of the sleeping bird – but was that definitive? Then finally the sleeping bird awoke and
raised its head just barely enough to give me a view of the base of the bill –
it was all black eliminating Mute Swan.
It also eliminated Tundra, though no Tundras had been reported at the
site. I had my bird – after 15 years Trumpeter
Swan was “sanitized for your protection” on my MA list.
Back in
2004, I counted Trumpeter Swan as #365 on my MA list. Instead I should have added it in 2019 as
#414. That is assuming MARC ends up
accepting this bird in Milford.
My statebird
map for Trumpeter Swan is inserted below. The shaded states are those where I've seen this species; cross-hatched states are those in which this species is regular but I don't yet have it for that state list. Most of my sightings in the Midwest and East have been after the Great Lakes
re-introduction efforts. I know my VT
sighting in 2017 was countable and accepted by the VT Bird Records Committee. Hopefully all the others are countable as
well, or I’ll have to “sanitize” a bunch of those lists too.
No comments:
Post a Comment